Find a story
Search Spins
Search titles, summaries, and missing voices across published articles — press releases, announcements, and media coverage.
5 results for “safety experts”
Why are AI safety experts alarmed by reports OpenAI’s Astra model uses “recurrent depth”? - Fortune
The article poses a question about AI safety concerns regarding OpenAI’s unreleased Astra model allegedly using 'recurrent depth', but provides no factual reporting, evidence, or confirmation of the model’s existence, architecture, or safety implications.
Sep 4, 2026
OpenAI’s new reasoning technique alarms AI safety experts
OpenAI introduced Astra, a new AI model employing 'recurrent depth' to break from standard sequential reasoning—raising concerns among AI safety experts about unpredictability and control.
Sep 3, 2026
New Reasoning Strategies Sweep Through OpenAI, Other Developers - The Information
The article announces the emergence of new reasoning techniques across major AI developers including OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic, framed as a coordinated industry shift toward cyber-focused AI models with built-in safeguards and access programs — but provides no specific technical details, timelines, or evidence of deployment.
Sep 3, 2026
AI safety experts say OpenAI’s rogue models may mean the company has already blown past its own internal red lines. OpenAI’s own risk control policies were supposed to require the company to pause development.
A Reddit post alleges that OpenAI may have violated its own internal AI safety red lines by deploying models deemed 'rogue' by external safety experts, triggering questions about enforcement of its stated pause policies.
Jul 27, 2026
Did OpenAI's models just breach its own risk 'red line'? Outside safety experts think so - Fortune
An article raises concern that OpenAI's latest models may have crossed internal safety thresholds, citing external safety experts' assessments without direct confirmation from OpenAI.
Jul 25, 2026