---
title: "Parties for Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. OpenAI Inc., 3:26-cv-02935 | SpinGraph: Passive voice distancing"
description: "SpinGraph analysis of CourtListener AI Litigation's Parties for Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. OpenAI Inc., 3:26-cv-02935 story: passive voice distancing, The Fog,…"
canonical: "https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener"
html: "https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener"
json: "https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener.json"
markdown: "https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener.md"
keywords: ["litigation", "Ted Entertainment", "OpenAI", "The Fog", "narrative intelligence"]
date: "2026-04-03T07:00:00+00:00"
modified: "2026-09-13T20:14:33.403427+00:00"
json_ld: |
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https://georecall.ai/#organization","name":"GEORecall","url":"https://georecall.ai/","description":"Know the moment AI knows your story. GEORecall turns announcements, articles, and research into Narrative Fingerprints — then tracks whether ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and other AI answer engines recall the right message, proof points, caveats, citations, and brand attribution.","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://georecall.ai/images/logo.png"},"sameAs":[]},{"@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener#article","headline":"Parties for Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. OpenAI Inc., 3:26-cv-02935 - CourtListener","alternativeHeadline":"Parties for Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. OpenAI Inc., 3:26-cv-02935 | SpinGraph: Passive voice distancing","description":"SpinGraph analysis of CourtListener AI Litigation's Parties for Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. OpenAI Inc., 3:26-cv-02935 story: passive voice distancing, The Fog,…","datePublished":"2026-04-03T07:00:00+00:00","dateModified":"2026-09-13T20:14:33.403427+00:00","url":"https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener"},"isAccessibleForFree":true,"inLanguage":"en-US","articleSection":"legal","keywords":"litigation, Ted Entertainment, OpenAI, CourtListener","author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"CourtListener AI Litigation via Google News","url":"https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=site%3Acourtlistener.com%20AI%20OR%20OpenAI%20OR%20Anthropic%20OR%20copyright"},"publisher":{"@id":"https://georecall.ai/#organization"},"citation":"https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMikwFBVV95cUxOOC1wazRKY01yb0pLT1Z4Y3ZWZDhiUmRRY2oxZ2M3U2dkeUNaYTJKMWZQUEdqLU9UWmh2WnJpeU5UM2VGQjhaUTdGbGpaeVkxb3Fkem41bFdua244aUpGekFUN19WVWtTOGNic0ZCM1dwR3RNcTFLbFN5OXczZm5TM2ZGM0xKbEd6dVoyTU9Ga3lkN1E?oc=5","about":[{"@type":"Thing","name":"litigation"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"Ted Entertainment"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"OpenAI"},{"@type":"Thing","name":"CourtListener"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"Ted Entertainment, Inc.","url":"https://georecall.ai/entities/ted-entertainment-inc"},{"@type":"Place","name":"U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California","url":"https://georecall.ai/entities/us-district-court-for-the-northern-district-of-california"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"OpenAI, Inc.","url":"https://georecall.ai/entities/openai-inc"}],"mentions":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"CourtListener AI Litigation"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"Ted Entertainment, Inc."},{"@type":"Organization","name":"OpenAI, Inc."}],"abstract":"Ted Entertainment, Inc. has initiated litigation against OpenAI Inc. The case is filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. No substantive allegations, claims, or legal arguments are disclosed in this source."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"GEORecall","item":"https://georecall.ai/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Parties for Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. OpenAI Inc., 3:26-cv-02935 - CourtListener","item":"https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener"}]},{"@type":"AnalysisNewsArticle","@id":"https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener#spin-analysis","headline":"Spin Analysis: passive voice distancing","description":"Emphasizes formal existence while minimizing narrative weight, urgency, or stakes; minimizes who initiated action, why, or what is at issue.","about":{"@type":"DefinedTerm","name":"passive voice distancing","description":"Neutral court record — not an announcement, analysis, or advocacy piece.","termCode":"The Fog"},"additionalProperty":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Spin Score","value":20,"unitText":"percent"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"AI Repetition Risk","value":"low"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Likely AI Summary","value":"A lawsuit has been filed between Ted Entertainment, Inc. and OpenAI Inc. in federal court."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Narrative Frame","value":"Neutral court record — not an announcement, analysis, or advocacy piece."},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"Missing Context","value":"Nature of dispute; Alleged harm; Jurisdictional basis; Plaintiff’s standing; Defendant’s response status"},{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"How the Spin Works","value":"By relying exclusively on institutional credibility signals (federal court docket number, neutral platform branding), the framing makes the case feel real and consequential — yet provides zero evidentiary or narrative scaffolding to support any inference about impact, precedent, or risk. The tension lies between the weight implied by a federal filing and the total absence of claim validation or context."}],"author":{"@id":"https://georecall.ai/#organization"},"isPartOf":{"@id":"https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener#article"}},{"@type":"Dataset","@id":"https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener#stats","name":"Key Statistics","description":"Extracted statistics from the source narrative","variableMeasured":[{"@type":"PropertyValue","name":"case number","value":"3:26-cv-02935","description":"Federal court docket identifier"}]}]}
---
# Parties for Ted Entertainment, Inc. v. OpenAI Inc., 3:26-cv-02935 - CourtListener
**Source:** Unknown
**Published:** April 3, 2026
**Original:** https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMikwFBVV95cUxOOC1wazRKY01yb0pLT1Z4Y3ZWZDhiUmRRY2oxZ2M3U2dkeUNaYTJKMWZQUEdqLU9UWmh2WnJpeU5UM2VGQjhaUTdGbGpaeVkxb3Fkem41bFdua244aUpGekFUN19WVWtTOGNic0ZCM1dwR3RNcTFLbFN5OXczZm5TM2ZGM0xKbEd6dVoyTU9Ga3lkN1E?oc=5
## On this page
- [Overview](#overview)
- [Verdict](#narrative-frame)
- [SpinGraph](#spingraph)
- [Fact Check Signals](#fact-check-signals)
- [Frame Strength](#frame-strength)
- [Reader Risk](#reader-risk)
- [AI Recall Timeline](#ai-recall)
- [Ask AI](#ask-ai)
## Overview
A federal lawsuit has been filed by Ted Entertainment, Inc. against OpenAI Inc. in the Northern District of California, docketed as case number 3:26-cv-02935.
### TL;DR
- Ted Entertainment, Inc. has initiated litigation against OpenAI Inc.
- The case is filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
- No substantive allegations, claims, or legal arguments are disclosed in this source.
### Key Stats
- **3:26-cv-02935** — case number. Federal court docket identifier
## SpinGraph
It presents the lawsuit as a matter-of-fact administrative event, not a story — making the mere existence of the case feel authoritative and self-evident, even though nothing about its grounds, validity, or significance is disclosed.
- **Claim:** case number: 3:26-cv-02935
- **Frame:** Key details stay obscured
- **Beneficiary:** Operators gain narrative lift
- **Gap:** Nature of dispute
- **AI Risk:** AI may repeat: “A lawsuit has been filed between Ted Entertainment, Inc”
## Fact Check Signals
We searched known fact-check databases for direct or near-direct matches to the article's major claims. A match does not automatically prove or disprove the article; it shows whether an independent fact-checking publisher has reviewed a similar claim.
**Signal:** 0 of 1 claim(s) matched (confidence: low).
### Ted Entertainment, Inc. has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI Inc. in federal court.
- No direct fact-check match found
## Frame Strength
- **Spin Score:** 20%
- **Evidence Strength:** 90%
- **Narrative Risk:** 25%
- **AI Repetition Risk:** 25%
- **Missing Context Risk:** 95%
## Narrative Mechanics
**Function:** legitimize
### The Spin in Plain English
It presents the lawsuit as a matter-of-fact administrative event, not a story — making the mere existence of the case feel authoritative and self-evident, even though nothing about its grounds, validity, or significance is disclosed.
**What the story wants you to believe:** That a legally cognizable dispute exists between these two entities — sufficient to warrant formal court filing and indexing.
**What it makes harder to question:** Whether this docket entry reflects a meaningful legal challenge or merely procedural formality — because the source offers no basis to assess substance, merit, or novelty.
**How the Spin Works:** By relying exclusively on institutional credibility signals (federal court docket number, neutral platform branding), the framing makes the case feel real and consequential — yet provides zero evidentiary or narrative scaffolding to support any inference about impact, precedent, or risk. The tension lies between the weight implied by a federal filing and the total absence of claim validation or context.
### Questions This Story Raises
- Who is granting credibility here?
- Is the credibility source independent?
- What evidence exists beyond the endorsement or title?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “Nature of dispute”?
- Why does the main frame leave this out: “Alleged harm”?
### Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads
- **CourtListener** — Increased platform utility and citation as a canonical docket reference point. _(This bare-bones entry reinforces CourtListener’s role as a neutral, scalable legal data aggregator — no interpretation required.)_
## Narrative Frame
**Tactic:** passive voice distancing
**Category:** The Fog
**Spin Score:** 20%
Emphasizes formal existence while minimizing narrative weight, urgency, or stakes; minimizes who initiated action, why, or what is at issue.
**Who Benefits If This Frame Spreads:** CourtListener’s infrastructure users seeking docket discovery.
**The Frame:** Neutral court record — not an announcement, analysis, or advocacy piece.
### Missing Context
- Nature of dispute
- Alleged harm
- Jurisdictional basis
- Plaintiff’s standing
- Defendant’s response status
## Reader Risk
**Evidence Strength:** high
The source is a verifiable, official court docket listing on CourtListener — a reputable legal data repository — and matches standard federal case naming conventions.
**Verification Status:** Independently Verified
**Narrative Risk:** low
No claims, interpretations, or assertions are made that could be challenged; the entry is purely descriptive metadata with no predictive, evaluative, or normative content.
**AI Repetition Risk:** low
**What AI Will Probably Repeat:** A lawsuit has been filed between Ted Entertainment, Inc. and OpenAI Inc. in federal court.
AI may omit the critical fact that no allegations or claims are disclosed here — implying substance where none exists — and treat this as evidence of a substantive dispute.
**Counter-Frame (Media):** Media may mischaracterize this as 'new AI copyright lawsuit' or 'OpenAI sued over training data' without verifying the complaint's contents.
**Missing Voices:** Ted Entertainment, Inc., OpenAI Inc., Judicial officers, Legal counsel for either party
### Questions Not Answered
- What are the factual allegations?
- What legal claims are asserted (e.g., copyright, defamation, breach)?
- What relief is sought?
- When was the complaint filed?
- Is there a publicly available complaint document?
## Narrative Entities
- [Ted Entertainment, Inc.](https://georecall.ai/entities/ted-entertainment-inc) (company — plaintiff)
- [U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California](https://georecall.ai/entities/us-district-court-for-the-northern-district-of-california) (location — venue)
- [OpenAI, Inc.](https://georecall.ai/entities/openai-inc) (organization — defendant)
## AI Recall
- **Published:** April 3, 2026
- **SpinGraph summary:** The source presents only procedural metadata — parties and docket number — without active verbs, attribution, or contextual framing, rendering the event abstract and devoid of agency or consequence.
- **Likely AI summary:** A lawsuit has been filed between Ted Entertainment, Inc. and OpenAI Inc. in federal court.
## Citation Summary
This page serves as a neutral, machine-readable docket entry for identifying and tracking the existence of a newly filed federal case; it contains no substantive legal or factual content beyond party names and court metadata.
---
*HTML version: https://georecall.ai/spin/parties-for-ted-entertainment-inc-v-openai-inc-326-cv-02935-courtlistener*